gunzip -c myfolder.tar.gz | tar -xf - This is in action. Two tools, each doing one thing well, combined into a powerhouse. π Part 3: Why Not Just Use ZIP? ZIP does both: archiving + compression. So why does the open-source world still love .tar.gz ?
Letβs unpack it. (Pun intended.) First, meet tar (Tape ARchive). Born in the early days of Unix, tar was designed for tape drives . Its job was simple: Take a bunch of files and folders, glue them into one big byte stream, preserving permissions, owners, and directory structure. Thatβs it. No compression. Just packing . gzipped tarball
The flags stick like glue: reate, e x tract, z (gzip), f ile. π Final Thought The next time you curl a .tar.gz of some GitHub repo, think of the 1970s tape drives, the 1990s compression wars, and the stubborn Unix philosophy of βdo one thing well.β gunzip -c myfolder
| Feature | .tar.gz | .zip | |--------|-----------|--------| | Preserves Unix permissions | β Yes | β No (ignores execute bits, symlinks) | | Streamable | β Yes (tape/pipe friendly) | β Needs central directory at end | | Open standard | β Fully | β οΈ Partially (some extensions proprietary) | | Compression ratio | β Very good (DEFLATE) | β Same algorithm | | Random access | β Painful | β Possible | ZIP does both: archiving + compression